REVIEWS. Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pages. Christopher Norris, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. Criticism and Institutions: The American an Culler – – In Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.), Post-Structuralism. Jonathan Culler, On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Pp. – Volume 13 Issue.
|Published (Last):||20 September 2013|
|PDF File Size:||10.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Culler Limited preview – Mike Fuller – – Cogito 10 1: But one can argue that in fact the transformation or modification of meaning that characterises misunderstanding is also at work in what we call understanding This Jonathan Cullre has supplied in On Deconstruction with his customary lucidity and care. Contact Contact Us Help.
In my view, the most glaring weakness of American Deconstruction is not its intellectual incoherence but its cultural evasiveness. Subtitle Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Everything can be given at least two equally deocnstruction explanations. No harm in that. But experience always has this divided, duplicated character; it has always already occurred and yet is still to be produced.
Language is partly an autonomous system and is partly a set of names that derive their meaning from outside the system. Modern Criticism and Theory a Reader. Abrams Marxism meaning metaphor metaphysics of presence metonymy mimesis misreading narrative notion parergon pharmakon philosophy play poem political position possibility post-structuralism post-structuralist present principle prior readings problem procedures produce psychoanalysis put in question reader referential relation repetition representation rhetorical role Rousseau Saussure Semiotics sexual signature signifier speech acts Stanley Fish stories of reading struc structuralist structure supplement textual thematic theme cullfr tion tradition treat truth ture uncanny understanding utterance woman women writing.
On Deconstruction is both an authoritative synthesis dceonstruction Derrida’s thought and an analysis of the often-problematic relation between his cullsr writings and the work of literary critics.
Jonathan Culler’s On Deconstruction is a typically patient, thoughtful, illuminating exposition of the ideas of Jacques Derrida and their application to literary studies. Jonxthan Saussure rightly stressed the autonomous character of language systems, and rightly opposed the view that language is just a set of names for extra-linguistic realities, he was wrong to state his point so absolutely.
Formalism has seduced American literary study away from these authentic and original cultural purposes. Critical Consequences Chapter Three.
As an example of the one-sidedness of Big-D Deconstruction, we may consider how it treats the following list of contraries:. Institutions and Inversions pp. In this review I shall pay rather less attention to Culler than to his master. On Deconstruction is both an authoritative synthesis of Derrida’s thought and an analysis of the often-problematic relation between his philosophical writings and joanthan work of literary critics.
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 3: Such tendencies to monism are a persistent jonzthan for deconstructionists, and a danger that they rarely avoid in practice. Deconstruction has forced traditionalists to look to their assumptions and protect their theoretical flanks. That choice ought to be in favour of Hegel. Main content page count Added to PP index Total downloads 7of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Cyller Criticism Bibliography Translations Bibliography Bibliography for the 25th Anniversary Edition Index On Deconstruction “Academic literary criticism continues to be dominated by ‘theory’ and the struggle between ddeconstruction and humanist approaches to the business of reading.
Aesthetics Philosophy of Literature, Misc in Aesthetics categorize this paper.
To think that formalism could suffice in teaching a literary tradition is an even more obvious mistake. Publication Ithaca, United States. Emma Williams – – Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 Of those contraries listed above, perhaps the fourth, the non-temporal v. Philosophy of Literature, Misc in Aesthetics.
Stories of Reading Chapter Two. No jonwthan specified fix it.
The principle of difference as enunciated by Saussure requires a stable system of oppositions: For a recent account of empirical work on names and the function of language in the development of concepts and vice versa, see Language Acquisition.
Account Options Sign in. The Instabilities of Thought. From these varied writings a general structure emerges.
On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism – Jonathan Culler – Google Books
An academic institution, like any other, adopts an ideology that preserves the institution as it is. My library Help Advanced Book Search. One ought therefore to distinguish between authentic deconstruction deconsttruction capital-D Deconstruction, which in its monistic forms is a very inconsistent philosophy indeed. Similarly, just as the New Criticism tended to find that the subject of literature was literature, Deconstruction finds that the subject of literature is Deconstruction.
Psychologically, jnoathan thought, apart from its expression in words — is only a shapeless and indistinct mass. This article has no associated abstract. Post-Structuralism and the Question of History. Cornell University Press Amazon. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.